[Typo3] Typo3 vs Plone. What are strenghts and weaknesses?

[Jan-Hendrik Heuing [DD]]

Funny subject

Strenghts: TYPO3
Weakness: Plone

SCNR

;)

JH


"robert rottermann" <robert at redcor.ch> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
news:mailman.3188.1133635837.24100.typo3-english at lists.netfielders.de...
> Hi Michael,
> have you had the time to look into Plone yet.
> I would be glad to hear of your experiences
>
> Robert
>
> Michael Scharkow wrote:
>> robert wrote:
>>> Suman,
>>> thanks for your email.
>>> I did not yet look at cmsmatrix.org because I am not so much interested 
>>> in raw features.
>>> So I took your mail as reason to compare typo3 and Plone on 
>>> cmsmatrix.org.
>>>
>>> A couple of things that revealed:
>>> - feature wise the two systems are comparable
>>> - the matrix is not very up do date (I can only judge Plone)
>>> - the use of such a comparson borders to nil. (in a very early state of 
>>> evaluation it might be interesting)
>>
>> Full ack. There's nothing like a manual review on both systems, the 
>> cmsmatrix stuff seems to be taken from the feature lists only. I plan to 
>> write a comparison of Plone/Typo3 once I have a litte more time. It will 
>> be, of course, about getting into Plone from a Typo3 user's perspective.
>>
>> I did a bit of toying around with Plone this weekend, and it looks a lot 
>> more like one of the *Nukes or Slashdot than TYPO3. The basic portal 
>> features and workflow are there out of the box, but customizing the look 
>> and feel seems a lot more troublesome than with TYPO3.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Michael
>> _______________________________________________
>> Typo3-english mailing list
>> Typo3-english at lists.netfielders.de
>> http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english
>>
>