<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Karsten Dambekalns wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="midmailman.1.1087395237.10107.typo3-dev@lists.netfielders.de"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
On 2004-06-15, stefano cecere <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:scecere@krur.com"><scecere@krur.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">(realURL is something so important and so buggy that makes me really
think)
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
This Is off topic, but I simply don't get it. What is so important
about RealUrl? I'd really like to know (but maybe in another thread,
if at all).
I mean,
123.0.html
IS easier to note down and enter manually than
/Documentation/Matrix/Core_gl_ap/some_truncated_st/
or something even worse.
If you don't like
Some_truncated_st.0.html
as is possible already, then go and use aliases wisely to get
docabout_something.html
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
It is important because <your site>/sports/ means something to
users, <your site>/483.6.html does not.<br>
<br>
Best regards<br>
Jan<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>