[From nobody Wed Mar  3 11:09:22 2021
To: 
Subject: 
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:15:55 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C42807.59D17D80"


------_=_NextPart_002_01C42807.59D17D80
Content-Type: text/plain



------_=_NextPart_002_01C42807.59D17D80
Content-Type: text/plain;
	name="ATT00862.txt"
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename="ATT00862.txt"

Hi,

> please don't, we are not microsoft or ibm.
> an open source project should be clear in versioning and not confuse
> users with strange names (think e.g. about mozilla, moving step by step
> forward, but still sticking at 1.7b).

many OSS-Projects have codenames, the linux kernel, the open ticket 
request system...
Why not, an open source system should not only provide a software 
packages, the tagging of release with creative codenames is a nice
way for steps.

kasper, shouldn't you know many cigar labels??? ;)


for version numbering why don't use the linux kernel format.

2.x.1... for
x => odd numbers for devel branches, the others for the stable

so it is possible to release quite often devel-releases between to 
stable releases.

greetings sven

------_=_NextPart_002_01C42807.59D17D80--
]