[TYPO3-dev] Why are timestamp fields NOT NULL?

Sebastian Michaelsen sebastian.gebhard at gmail.com
Wed Jan 5 11:38:33 CET 2011


Am 05.01.2011 11:37, schrieb Jigal van Hemert:
> In the past 0 (zero) has been selected as the magic value for a date which is not set.
>
> There are a few locations where this magic value was forgotten (and incorrectly the date 01-01-70
> was displayed) and I've already seen some patches to fix this.

Sounds good, I'll hand in a patch :)




More information about the TYPO3-dev mailing list