[TYPO3-dev] Revamped FORM cObj, take 2

[Christopher Torgalson]

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Steffen Kamper <steffen at sk-typo3.de> wrote:
>
>  "Christopher Torgalson" <bedlamhotel at gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>  news:mailman.7003.1205314486.5943.typo3-dev at lists.netfielders.de...
>  > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Steffen Kamper <steffen at sk-typo3.de>
>  > wrote:
>  >>
>  >>  "Christopher Torgalson" <bedlamhotel at gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>  >>  news:mailman.6996.1205313460.5943.typo3-dev at lists.netfielders.de...
>  >>  > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Dmitry Dulepov [typo3]
>  >>  > <dmitry at typo3.org> wrote:
>  >>  >> Christopher Torgalson wrote:
>  >>  >>  > They are quite nicely styled, but they're a bit useless--they rely
>  >>  >>  > *totally* on javascript. No javascript, no form at all...
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  Who runs browser without JavaScript now? It is like using
>  >>  >> blacn-and-white monitor :)
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  > Are we talking about BE or FE?
>  >>
>  >>  this is all BE concerned, the Form wizard is one Element in BE
>  >
>  >
>  > Even so. If there's any chance of new 4.x features winding up in 5.0,
>  > I say javascript-heavy implementations that *cannot* work without
>  > javascript are at least problematic.
>  >
>  >
>
>  this is no matter, whole BE, beginning from Login, doesn't work without JS,
>  so this is mandantory.


In 5.0? This is already built? Besides because that's how it *is* does
NOT mean that new development should repeat past errors.


-- 
Christopher Torgalson
http://www.typo3apprentice.com/