[TYPO3-dev] typolink - link to records 2

[Steffen Kamper]

Hi Daniel,

i really like the enhancement.
I'm not sure with the configurable tabs.

May be default should be a general tab with all records (like in the list 
view of BE) because the other way you have to configure each record type you 
want to use.
May be you can "override" the general tab by configuring special tabs, but 
it should work also without any additional configuration.

vg  Steffen

"Daniel Pötzinger" <operation-lan at gmx.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
news:mailman.1.1191521014.32494.typo3-dev at lists.netfielders.de...
> Ernesto Baschny [cron IT] schrieb:
>> Daniel Pötzinger wrote: on 04.10.2007 19:06:
>>
>>>> Definitively! I had just a quick look in the source code. Maybe we 
>>>> could
>>>> simplify the "browse_links" additions so instead of having "tabs" we
>>>> could use the "Pages" tab and simply list records from other tables
>>>> instead of just tt_content in the already present "list view". So if
>>>> tt_news records are "linkeable", simply show them in the list view
>>>> together with the tt_content elements which already do something
>>>> different (adds an anchor to the target URL).
>>>>
>>>> The tab name could then be renamed to "Pages / Records".
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>
>>> I definitly like it more to have the option to configure additional 
>>> tabs.
>>> Like you see in the example you can configure a tab which is called
>>> "News" and where you only see the sysfolder with news.
>>> That is really nice to teach to an editor: "If you want to link to a
>>> news - just select "News" Tab and select your newsitem"
>>>
>>> The behaviour of "page" tab now is that if you click on a page directly
>>> the link is generated. Its even more difficult to tell an editor to
>>> first click on that little ">" icon right to the page and then select
>>> your record.
>>
>> True stuff... And this is a matter for the HCI team anyway! ;)
>>
>> So why is the RTE browse_links different from the "standard" one? I
>> haven't really looked into this, but do you know the reasoning for this
>> being separate? Is the API different? Aren't the requirements the same?
>>
> Don't know exactly what you mean, but I can explain what I did.
>
> I add a hook in class.browse_links.php and 
> class.tx_rtehtmlarea_browse_links.php. In both classes the hook is 
> implemented in the same way. (a internal array with hookobjets is 
> initialised, and several functions in this hookobjects are called in 
> diffrent functions of the browse_links class)
>
> The reason why both classes needs to be adjusted is:
> class.browse_links.php
> is used by the normal link wizard (e.g. if you have a TCA link field)
>
> class.tx_rtehtmlarea_browse_links.php extends browse_links.php and is only 
> used in links called from the RTE htmlarea. Therefore tho hook is also 
> implemented there.
>
> (Finaly the extension linkHandler registers as a hook and adds the Tabs)
>
> Was this your question?