[TYPO3-dev] Let's rate!

[Widmann, Manfred]

Why comparing missing rates with missing documents? Both isn't ok and we 
should work to settle both. Isn't it a bit childish to say "I'll rate the 
ext - but little Anni has to doc it first?"

best
Manfred

+1 for rating and +1 for documenting!
"Matthias Stuebner" <news at stuebner.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
news:mailman.1.1175068289.1471.typo3-dev at lists.netfielders.de...
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:05:15 +0300, Dmitry Pikhno wrote:
>
>> There are hundreds and hundreds extensions in repository, but only
>> small part of them are rated. What a shame! I suggest following: open
>> one of your most used typo3 site, then go to Ext. Manager and step by
>> step rate all extensions that you usually use. We have to say "thanks"
>> to those people who develop these nice and useful extensions!
>
> There are hundreds of extensions without even a minimum documentation. 
> THAT
> is a shame, as this means that they are usable for people who are very 
> good
> in source code reading only.
>
> Even I agree your thinking about rating extensions, I would recommend not
> to rate any extension without documentation.
>
> Maybe a bit strict, but I don't see any excuse not to have a one-page
> description of an extension at least.
> -- 
> br Matthias