[Typo3-dev] Patent on CMS
Martin T. Kutschker
Martin-no5pam-Kutschker at blackbox.n0spam.net
Fri Jun 18 15:27:13 CEST 2004
Wengrzik, Andreas wrote:
> I saw this link in the German Typo3 User Group!!
>
> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,745,238.WKU.&OS=PN/6,745,238&RS=PN/6,745,238
>
> Kasper, is your great 'CMS' affected by this rule/patent?
>
> I don´t know what america do with their patents - it´s step backwards what they are doing.... first things linke 'double klick' now complete type of systems, maybe we should get a
> patent for breathing or a global patent for operating systems.... Like Michael Moore said.... 'stupid white man' ....
>
> So what happens now??
[repost from typo3.english]
Dunno, I am incapable of reading the "patentalese". To me it's an
artform, which basic goal is too actually hide the idea ;-)
From the summary it looks like a SQL-based CMS/Wiki combo, with role
separation (incl. structure and graphical design) and rights managment.
Despite the claim in the patent I don't think that separation and
weubuser input (blog, wiki, news submission) is sufficiently new to
declare it an "invention". It was granted only recently, but I don't
think it would hold in court if it wasn't submitted quite a long time
before. Otherwise there has to be some kind of prior art.
But the key point I think in this patent is the participation of the
webuser. A "simple" CMS (driven only by BE editors) is not covered by
this patent (as I read it).
Masi
[new]
PS: If you don't want software patents in Europe, fight! The commission
has dropped all of the sensible amendments made by the parliament last
year. There is only a very small chance theat we don't have SW patents
here in Europe by autumn. The fight's not over, but I have liitle hope
the "small guys" will win. IBM, MS,.... they all rely heavily on
patenting anything.
More information about the TYPO3-dev
mailing list